1.
Epistemology is the
foundation of our learning and how we learn this information, whereas
instructional methods and theories are seemingly derived from this foundation
but go a step farther by targeting specific needs of learning. What I believe to be the biggest difference
in the theories, methods and models of learning and epistemologies is that
other modes are focused on the specifics of learning and not the base
information. I have a young student who
is learning his alphabet letters and sounds.
In the beginning of our lessons it appeared that he knew a few of the
letters despite only be 6 and battling disabilities. I though he knew the letter a, but soon
realized that he only knew one letter by sight.
It turned out that when I shuffled the order that every letter was “A”. I found out that he did not recognize any of
his letters. When presented the letters
after shuffling he could not tell me the letters that were displayed. He knew the letter order but did not know the
letters independently. I also learned that
despite being able to say each letter he was unable to attribute the actual
letter sound.
2.
I feel that I sway
between being a Relativist and Contextualist framework in my method of
teaching. It typically depends on the
instructional setting that I am teaching.
In my early career of education I was in a general education classroom
and would have told you that I was a Relativist because I had to get my student
to understand that the learning that was being presented to them was relevant
to them and their learning. However,
having moved into a special education setting a few years ago I find that my
students understood the importance to the learning but did not understand the
concept being taught.
While in college during the 90’s
I experienced a negative situation regarding opposing perspectives. I was taking psychology in college and a
professor verbally attacked me based on my perspective of the concept behind Freudian
Theory. The professor was set in her
position and was not going to entertain any other thoughts of this theory than
her own. She effectively kicked me out
of class and reported me to the dean based on a mere question that mildly
challenged her view. The end result was
that I was transferred to another class.
I do believe that the conflict was due to our opposing epistemic
stances. The professor had a belief that
Freud was a joke and a pervert and would listen to nothing I was saying. The problem all stemmed from the translation
of the Austrian word for pleasure having an English meaning tied to sexual
desires. My comment in class was simply
asked from a different perspective.
3.
With behaviorist I
feel that learning can take place with a negative or unpleasant experience
being involved. I once had a student
that spit on his peer. He was sent to the office and his consequence
was that he had to spit in a cup until it was full. He learned that the act of spitting on
someone was not a pleasurable act and the act of spitting in a cup over and
over was not pleasurable was well. Equally effective can be a positive
experience. For example, when I line by
students up for lunch and I notice that not all my students are in line, as our
student’s expectation state, rather than calling out the kids that are not
doing as expected I will comment on the kids who are doing what is expected, “I
like the way Suzie is stand in line.” Or
“I like the way Bobby is facing forward.”
I am reminding my students of the expectation without drawing negative
attention on any student and over time they all come into line correctly so
that they can receive the positive comments.
With the constructivist I feel
that learning is being built from a foundation.
When I teach Calendar math I am constructing knowledge of a basic
foundation that my student have already and I am building on that knowledge and
expanding their understanding. My
students have the foundation of a calendar and understand the importance of the
calendar but lack the knowledge of how the days of the week, months of the year
and the different seasons are related to the calendar. As a constructivist I am taking what they
know about the calendar and building on their knowledge and expanding each time
we meet and discuss the calendar and its components in relation to real would
application.
It surprised me when you mentioned that you had a professor that verbally attacked you based on your perspective. I think that situation most certainly qualifies as a conflict between different learning perspectives. I like the example that you bring up about positively reinforcing your students' behavior in line by complementing those individuals who are behaving correctly versus focusing on those that are not. I think that many times, our first thought is to try to correct the negative behavior by pointing it out, but this example reminds us that by highlighting the positive behavior, we can eventually achieve the desired results because the most of other students desire the same positive feedback that they have seen their peers receive.
ReplyDeleteEnjoyed reading your post.
Steffanye,
ReplyDeleteI liked your post because you gave us some very good personal experiences where you used different teaching techniques. You have some very interesting teaching stories and that is a great help to people like me that are new and need an experienced person's perspective.
I was totally amazed about your story regarding the student and his alphabet. It is crazy how it was the idea in isolation, but not true understanding. I love how you broke the idea up and recognized the deficits he was dealing with. As an OT, I hope he was able to find ways to learn his letters that were meaningful to him. Would have loved to be a fly on the wall for that.
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing,
Jennifer